cleanmymac x activation code github

CleanMyMac X Crack 4.8.4 With Keygen Free Download 2021 CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crack free download is an amazing application for Mac. X tutorial. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Run: sudo xattr -r -d com.apple.quarantine /Applications/CleanMyMac\ X.app. CleanMyMac X 4.6.10 Crack Keygen + Full License Key 2020 [Latest] is an amazing app for cleaning and optimizing any Mac. cleanmymac x activation code github

Cleanmymac x activation code github -

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack Full Keygen With Torrent [Latest]

CleanMyMac XCrack is a the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac that is developed by “Mac Paw Company”. It looks great in appearance and is simply easy to understand. That software cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system.  You can instantly remove unnecessary, unusual, useless junk files, corrupt files trash, and frees up a lot of memory space. In addition, it has all the advanced techniques for removing junk data and has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac system. It saves the different rules of the database system and also knows what should be scanned or what should not. No file can hide from this scanning algorithm. It scans every inch of your system with its thorough and comprehensive scanner and then cleans all the files by pressing just one button.

CleanMyMac X Crack

CleanMyMac Keygen is software that increases system performance and speed. When talking about any mac issue, fixing it usually takes hours but installing the CleanMyMac X Crack is not going to happen because its development makes it so accessible and informative. Besides, No data can hide from users’ view with it. This application keeps your Mac clean without any bug or issue like the newly installed Mac system. It also shows all the data of old files that you have never seen a long time ago.

CleanMyMac X Crack With Free Activation Number 2022

Additionally, CleanMyMac Activation Number is a reliable and very convenient software for Mac. It has all the features that are a need for Mac. You can Scan and remove junk files easily. The extensive menu is also a numerous feature. This function allows you to manage all of your extensions. The interface is very user-friendly; you don’t need any unique skills to use it. Anyone can efficiently use it and boost the performance of Mac. This program removes all the remaining files and junks of this application and removes it from your Mac completely. You can also detect outdated and corrupt software to keep your Mac updated.

There is much other software that is used to enhance the performance of Mac. All have many functions, but CleanMyMac X Torrent is the best software for Mac as all the features are filled in one packet. You can improve Mac performance and remove the files and documents that are not necessary. It also allows you to uninstall the application that causes the system to slower.

CleanMyMac X Mac Activation key Full Crack

CleanMyMac Activation Number is fairly simple anyone can use it without any knowledge or training. It is an outstanding tool to eliminate junk data and doesn’t allow Mac OS to slow down the processor while running it. Moreover, it allows the user to classify which file they want to delete and which they want to keep. Also, it gives the opportunity to completely uninstall the installed program and safely erase its related data files, without the choice of recovering them later. When it is running you do not need to worry about clearing or cleaning procedures. CleanMyMac Full Crack contains the latest tools for system maintenance and level of privacy with full efficiency and accuracy. Also, It removes every process stuck in RAM and increases the performance of your system so that the system becomes more stable and runs much faster.

Scheduled Cleaning:

CleanMyMac X Crack offers you to create a schedule for cleaning Mac. You have a great idea of your Mac that what is the need of your Mac. it will notify you whenever the cleaning is required. This application allows you to adjust a schedule of various stages like one week, two weeks, a month, and three months. The schedule program clean system when the scheduling date occurs.

How Does It Work?

If you want to see how your Mac is working? You need to open it. All the system running files are shown, and you can manage all of them. This application also provides the facility to maintain a hard disk, memory usage, and battery status. It also notifies you that causes a system failure.

Useful Features of CleanMyMac Torrent Mac:

  • It Checks everything on your Mac like framework, photos, trash, iTunes, Old Organizers, and Email accounts. After this, you can easily understand what you need to do with these files. You can select files that are useless and make your Mac free.
  • You can put your photos in iCloud. These files are covered in your Photos Album. You can also reserve documents stack up on Mac.
  • This application allows you to create schedules to manage your Mac system. By managing your Mac all, you don’t need to worry about your Mac cleaning manual.
  • It provides you to manage the extension of your Mac. This feature is perfect for your Mac. You can remove any of the extra extension that is installed by some sudden works.
  • Also, you can increase the performance of the Mac system. It provides you with fixing all the bugs and uninstalls the unusable apps. So that your Mac work properly
  • The program also offers you to clean hard disks. You can see memory usage, hard disk space, and battery status. All of this feature is handy for your Mac system.

What’s New in CleanMyMac X 4.8.9?

  • Some bugs were fixed and increased performance.
  • Also, I added some new features.
  • Temporary Christmas themes are added to it.
  • Disk Representation is improved. Now free is replace with available.
  • Help and Around sectors are also enhanced.
  • Due to Compatibility issues, the starting verification of Disk is restricted To APFS.
  • All the well-known crashes and exclusions are fixed.

CleanMyMac X Crack Keygen

CleanMyMac Crack Features:

This program is for the cleaning of all kinds of junk data without any complications.

If users do not want anyone to recover their private or confidential data after deletion then this program has a feature that removes data in such a way that there is no chance of recovery.

Like house Mac also have many trash bin and each is for a different type of files. You can manage and clean all these app trash bins, image trash bins, mail trash bins, and many others without any difficulty.

With this application, you can clear all the useless and redundant data in your iTunes account and free up space for new data

It is an application manager for completely removing any application that causes problems with your system and also removes all the data related to that application.

In Addition, You can remove all data from emails that take a lot of memory space with just one click.

This tool offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working and can also help you get complete efficiency, performance, and health report of your system.

This application allows you to get rid of photos junk, temp files, iPhone files, broken files, and also for trash bins data.

The menu bar widget comes up with a new design that shows you the more defined and detailed information.

CleanMyMac X Full Keygen tracks all the applications that are running behind and stops them and speeds up the performance of your Mac.

The malware scanner tracks your Mac folders in-depth and removes all kinds of susceptible activities.

Furthermore, When you proceed for a scan, a bubble-like chat appears in CleanMyMac on the screen with other additional suggestions to remove the junk that you may want to do next. Also, You can find it on the top of the right side corner at any time by clicking on it for suggestions.

This new functionality can view all the updates that are required. This app or outside the app in the Mac store needs an update.

CleanMyMac X Activation Keys

R567Y-UHGFD-RT56T-YGHFD-ER456

GFDSE-456YT-GFDSE-W456Y-GFDRE

78YT7-89OIK-JHGFT-Y78IJ-HEFTY9

CleanMyMac Activation Code

34SW3-45RDE-4567U-HGFRT-5678I

KJHGY-789OK-JHUY8-9POLE-RT5YH

GFER5-EGRET-5YTYH-GFGRE-R23TR

What’s New in CleanMyMac X 4.8.9?

  • Some bugs were fixed and increased performance.
  • Also, I added some new features.
  • Temporary Christmas themes are added to it.
  • Disk Representation is improved. Now free is replace with available.
  • Help and Around sectors are also enhanced.
  • Due to Compatibility issues, the starting verification of Disk is restricted To APFS.
  • All the well-known crashes and exclusions are fixed.

How to Crack?

  1. Install the crack file and .exe file available below
  2. Extract the file and install it
  3. After installation, run the application
  4. You see that it automatically activates.
  5. There is nothing to do furthermore.
  6. Now enjoy the crack software!

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022 (Mac+Win) From The Links Below.

Download Now

Related

Источник: https://getmacsoftware.com/cleanmymac-x-crack/

CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crack + Full Activation Number 2021 [100% Working]

CleanMyMac X 4.5.1 Activation Number

CleanMyMac X Crack  Free is the most powerful software to clean malware, virus, rogues, and malicious apps. It heals all malicious activities. It provides safe and secure browsing. You can share viruses and malware-free data from one drive to another or USB to Mac. It provides protection against phishing activities, theft, and PC hack. CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Activation Key is helpful to optimize the performance of Mac.

CleanMyMac is a powerful app to clean, optimize, and protect your Mac for years of use. Run instant system cleanups, uninstall and update apps, remove malware, detect and erase files of any size, boost speed, and view a detailed visualization of your storage in Space Lens. All to fine-tune your Mac.

It makes your mac faster, efficient, and light to perform any task. They clean junk files, duplicate files, unwanted applications, malicious extensions, and harmful internet tools. He scans download data, shared data, USB, Windows drives sharing data, and email attachments. CleanMyMac4.8.4 is including other Mac operating systems and device optimization tools.

CleanMyMac XCrackis a powerful application for cleaning, optimizing, and protecting your Mac for years of use. It has a variety of tools, including complete system cleanup, uninstaller to delete applications on Mac, malware removal, a shredder to eliminate trace files, and a set of optimization tweaks to speed up. MacPaw Clean My Mac X Activation Code 2021 is like a helper for your Mac, keeping it clean to work like new.

CleanMyMac X Crack With License Key Full Version Free

Temporary files may accumulate on your drive until you run out of space, and your Mac’s configuration may become less optimized over time, slowing it down. CleanMyMac offers a complete toolkit to solve this problem.

The latest version of CleanMyMac X License Key 2021 is an all-in-one package for optimizing your Mac. It is capable of cleaning megatons of junk and making your computer run faster. Due to its multi-functionality, you can call it macOS cleaner, performance monitor, malware remover, and ransom. This program identifies dozens of unnecessary file types and scans them in nanoseconds. Your system contains a lot of useless files that need to be cleaned. So this app is the best recommendation for this. It can clean old system folders, photos, iTunes, mail, browsers, and large files.

CleanMyMac X 2021 Keygen includes the full version of Torrent

This application has the potential to take all the additional load on your system. In this way, you speed up your computer and prevent your computer from slowing down. The latest CleanMyMac X Keygen 4.8.2 gives you lifetime access to its cool features. Speeds up your Mac and makes it more responsive. Also, the full Cleanmymac cracking provides multi-language support to users all over the world. This program can silently detect all programs that are running in the background. Also, Cracked Cleanmymac allows you to turn it on or off as you wish. Besides that, it increases the speed of the processor.

CleanMyMac 2021 Full Torrent Free Download takes care of your privacy. For example, it keeps all your internet activities private, including browsing, etc. This program automatically clears all your browsing history like a browser kill switch. Besides that, it keeps you away from all the unwanted programs and threats.

CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Key Features:

  • Deeply scan your Mac.
  • Scans everything on your Mac.
  • Clean, optimize, and maintain your Mac.
  • Monitors the health of your Mac.
  • Removes gigabytes of junk from any drive.
  • Safely cleaned from your Mac.
  • Scan Mac’s system, Mail, Photos, iTunes, Trash bins, and old folder.
  • Cleans hidden data.
  • Speed ​​up Mac
    If your Mac has recently slowed down, you can regain speed with the optimization and maintenance tools in CleanMyMac Cracked. Both the system and the hard drive are messy with all kinds of junk, which is natural for the Mac. That’s why you need all the scripting and tweaking to get back to the speed your Mac had before.
  • Disc Cleaning
    There is almost no pleasure in browsing all your folders looking for files you don’t need. With CleanMyMac License Key, it’s ten times easier because it does the boring part for you: finding and sorting old files and digging caches with random application trash. All you have to do is press Clear at the end.
  • Uninstall app
    Mac applications are complicated when it comes to uninstalling. Moving it to Trash doesn’t free your Mac from all application files and some folders with the leftovers left on the drive. CleanMyMac Licensed Uninstaller removes unnecessary applications completely and with one click.
  • Malware Protection
    If you still believe a Mac isn’t infected with a virus, it’s time to update your information. The only way to keep malicious programs in place is to provide your regular Mac malware scan. CleanMyMac Activated can identify thousands of threats and neutralize them in seconds.
  • Clear history and cookies
    It’s much easier to choose all browsers you use in CleanMyMac Activation Key and delete all history, cookies, and cache in one click. You do not have to open each browser separately and look for where the developer has hidden cache history and clearing.
  • Delete old mail attachments
    Your desktop Mail Client stores all email attachments on your drive, even those you never downloaded from your own mail. It’s easier for your Mac to view and access these files. But in reality, these files take up gigabytes and you really don’t need them. So why not delete it and free up space?
  • The point
    CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Serial Key has received some nice improvements and is a fast and reliable way to remove gigabytes of junk from your hard drive. The Uninstaller and Updater modules have been amazing in their functions and utilities, but the Malware module is still unknown and development for five months has not taken it to the level where I am comfortable recommending it to other Mac users for their intended purpose destiny.

CleanMyMac X 4.3.0 Full Cracked TNT - lasopacpa

CleanMyMac X Features:

Mac system acceleration

In the event that your Mac has recently slowed down, you can restore speed with CleanMyMac X’s maintenance and optimization tools. Both the system and the hard drive are cluttered with all sorts of junk, which is normal for Macs. This is why you need all the scripts and modifications to get back to the speed your Mac used to be.

Disk cleanup

It’s hardly fun browsing through all your folders looking for files you don’t need. With CleanMyMac X it is ten times easier because the application does the boring part for you: it searches and classifies old files and searches a cache with a random junk application. All you have to do is press “Run” at the end.

Update and uninstall apps

Mac applications are difficult to uninstall. Moving it to the Trash doesn’t actually rid your Mac of all associated leftovers and files. The CleanMyMac X uninstaller completely removes unnecessary applications, while the updater allows you to constantly update necessary applications.

Remove malware and privacy

Although it is less vulnerable than other systems, macOS is still vulnerable to viruses. The only way to prevent malware is to run a regular malware scan on your Mac. CleanMyMac X Protection will help you neutralize virus threats, as well as clear browsing data on demand.

Get rid of large and unwanted files

Use CleanMyMac’s ruthless shredder to free up disk space and erase junk files forever. The tool removes all hidden items, also those that are blocked due to system errors. If you’re not sure what storage you have, check your Mac for large, old files – they may be hiding there.

See your storage with Space Lens

With CleanMyMac X, even the most clogged volume can be seen in detail. Space Lens visualizes the storage as a map made up of small and large files, including hidden files. Analyze internal and external storage, compare file and folder sizes, and delete separate items.

How to Activate CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 with Crack?

  1. 1st of all install CleanMyMac 4.8.4 free from the official site, download folder, or DVD.
  2. Go to properties of CleanMyMac 4.8.4
  3. Check activation status and Change CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Activation Code if not activated.
  4. Now copy the Activation Number of CleanMyMac 4.8.4 or use crack from the download folder.
  5. Paste in the activation box.
  6. Wait for some time to show a successful activation message.
  7. Finally, enjoy using registered CleanMyMac 4.8.4

How to clean your Mac in 3 simple steps:

  1. Install & open CleanMyMac 4.8.1 interface.
  2. Now Press the Scan button to see how much junk can be removed.
  3. Next Press Clean to get rid of that junk in seconds.

CleanMyMac X Serial Keys:

QASWED4-R5T6Y7U8-I90OP-0O9I8U7

Y6T5R4-E3W23E4-R5T6Y78-UI90O9I8

U7Y6T5R4-E3SWE4-R5T6Y7-U8I90OO

9I8U7Y6T5-R4DE4R-T56Y7U-I9O0I8U

HY76GT5-FRDESW-EDRT6YH-7UJIKOI

CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crack + Activation Number Keygen 2021 Free FromOfficial Links or Shared Below.

Download Now

Note: I humbly request you to purchase Genuine / Working CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Activation Number from CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Official site or Authenticated dealer.

Источник: https://crackedinfo.org/cleanmymac-x-crack/

CleanMyMac X Crack With Full Activation Code [Latest]CleanMyMac Activation Number

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2Crack is the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac that is developed by “Mac Paw Company”. It looks great in appearance and is simply easy to understand. That software cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system.  You can instantly remove unnecessary, unusual, useless junk files, corrupt files trash, and free up a lot of memory space. In addition, it has all the advanced techniques for removing junk data and has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac system. It saves the different rules of the database system and also knows what should be scanned or what should not. No file can hide from this scanning algorithm. It scans every inch of your system with its thorough and comprehensive scanner and then cleans all the files by pressing just one button.

CleanMyMac Keygen is software that increases system performance and speed. When talking about any mac issue, fixing it usually takes hours but installing the CleanMyMac X Crack is not going to happen because its development makes it so accessible and informative. Besides, No data can hide from users’ views. This application keeps your Mac clean without any bug or issue like the newly installed Mac system. It also shows all the data of old files that you have never seen a long time ago.

CleanMyMac X Activation Number Full Crack

CleanMyMac Activation Numberis fairly simple anyone can use it without any knowledge or training. It is an outstanding tool to eliminate junk data and doesn’t allow Mac OS to slow down the processor while running it. Moreover, it allows the user to classify which file they want to delete and which they want to keep. Also, it gives the opportunity to completely uninstall the installed program and safely erase its related data files, without the choice of recovering them later. When it is running you do not need to worry about clearing or cleaning procedures. CleanMyMac Full Crack contains the latest tools for system maintenance and level of privacy with full efficiency and accuracy. Also, It removes every process stuck in RAM and increases the performance of your system so that the system becomes more stable and runs much faster.

CleanMyMac Crack

CleanMyMac X Crack Features:

CleanMyMac X is for the cleaning of all kinds of junk data without any complications.

If users do not want anyone to recover their private or confidential data after deletion then this program has a feature that removes data in such a way that there is no chance of recovery.

Like house Mac also have many trash bin and each is for a different type of file. You can manage and clean all these app trash bins, image trash bins, mail trash bins, and many others without any difficulty.

With CleanMyMac X, you can clear all the useless and redundant data in your iTunes account and free up space for new data

It is an application manager for completely removing any application that causes problems with your system and also removes all the data related to that application.

In Addition, You can remove all data from emails that take a lot of memory space with just one click.

This tool offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working and can also help you get complete efficiency, performance, and health report of your system.

CleanMyMac X Crack allows you to get rid of photos junk, temp files, iPhone files, broken files, and also for trash bins data.

The menu bar widget comes up with a new design that shows you the more defined and detailed information.

CleanMyMac X Full Keygen tracks all the applications that are running behind and stops them and speeds up the performance of your Mac.

The malware scanner tracks your Mac folders in-depth and removes all kinds of susceptible activities.

Furthermore, When you proceed for a scan, a bubble-like chat appears in CleanMyMac on the screen with other additional suggestions to remove the junk that you may want to do next. Also, You can find it on the top of the right side corner at any time by clicking on it for suggestions.

This new functionality can view all the updates that are required. This app or outside the app in the Mac store needs an update.

Also Download: CCleaner Pro Crack

CleanMyMac X Activation Keys

R567Y-UHGFD-RT56T-YGHFD-ER456

GFDSE-456YT-GFDSE-W456Y-GFDRE

78YT7-89OIK-JHGFT-Y78IJ-HEFTY9

CleanMyMac Activation Code

34SW3-45RDE-4567U-HGFRT-5678I

KJHGY-789OK-JHUY8-9POLE-RT5YH

GFER5-EGRET-5YTYH-GFGRE-R23TR

How to install CleanMyMac X Crack?

  1. Download the setup of CleanMyMac X Crack.
  2. Then, Install it.
  3. Copy crack files.
  4. Now, Paste and replace it into the installation folder.
  5. Activate the complete version
  6. Finally, enjoy it for a lifetime.
Источник: https://letcracks.com/cleanmymac-x-crack-code-2022/

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community ... a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,000 articles, 42,570,406 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia ... are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users ... 524 people ... And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,000

Cebuano 6,061,269

Swedish 2,875,133

German 2,633,307

French 2,374,875

Dutch 2,071,599

Russian 1,771,271

Spanish 1,731,740

Italian 1,726,497

Polish 1,496,868

Egyptian Arabic 1,376,598

Japanese 1,300,979

Vietnamese 1,270,091

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,531

Arabic 1,143,365

Ukrainian 1,123,197

Portuguese 1,077,389

Persian 846,650

Catalan 689,772

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization ... his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice ... and ... his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians ... remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency ... We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority ... (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish caching servers and back-end layer caching is done by Apache Traffic Server.[265]

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Category: Jpegmini mac crack

Download now! Download now. Share This Video on Social Media………. How to Use: Open destination folder and locate file notes.

NEW JPEGmini Pro Beta Tutorial Review pt. 1

We are not responsible for any illegal actions you do with theses files. All files have been tested before published, some of the files may have flagged by AV, but we assure there is no threats to your MAC.

Powered by WordPress. Contact Us. Menu Contact Us. This tool will work on your Mac, all latest versions are supported. Our tool is reliable and will do exactly what you expect and more.

JPEGmini Pro 2.2.3 Crack Torrent

Because out tools is adapted to all popular platforms, and we working to add more platforms every day. But Our main focus is Apple Macintosh operating systems. We always add some extras and special tricks to make are users more satisfied. Installation is easy and wont take long, after installation, please go to program folder and open notes. To open. Tags aimbot android Apple best cheat Cheats crack csgo download easy exploit free free robux full game get glitch hack hacking Hacks how how to ios ipad iphone jailbreak key Mac minecraft new patch PC roblox roblox hack roblox hack serial to tutorial unlimited robux wallhack Windows working.

Tag Cloud aimbot android Apple best cheat Cheats crack csgo download easy exploit free free robux full game get glitch hack hacking Hacks how how to ios ipad iphone jailbreak key Mac minecraft new patch PC roblox roblox hack roblox hack serial to tutorial unlimited robux wallhack Windows working.

Download JPEGmini Pro 2.2.3 Crack Mac & Activation Code Working & Tested

Pages Contact Us.It is also producing software. Due to its reliability, It is the most popular studio. It has many features such as Music sequencer and graphics.

You can scan all regular sound activities and trades information with external testers. This is also available for iPod,iPad portable devices and for Android. With Nexus Plugins, you can. Therefore, By using you can pore magic sounds and effects. With the full version offers you to enjoy lifetime updates of Fruity Loops absolutely free.

You can control any soundtrack easily, in case of panning, volume or tone. It is very useful for the general customer with respect to music. It is the most developed software in this field. Technical support 24 hours the clock. Each individual is a worry about the security issue.

When you introduce any program on your PC, viruses, Trojans, and malware enter on your PC and access your own profile and important details. In any case, FL Studio serial number gives you security, after installing this software your PC cannot hack and makes personal data secure.

It has an advantage that everybody can upgrade it with just a single click. It latest version released it will automatically update. January 29, March 18, April 14, Really Authentic Website. Thanks for providing the Cracked Fl studio 20 Crack version for free of cost, love you.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Apriori algorithm implementation in python code github

Email Address. FL Studio Table of Contents hide. Latest Version: Fl Studio CleanMyMac X Crack is a useful software that offers to clean your MAC of useless shots and allows you to simplify and save your Mac in a couple of minutes. More, The latest version provides the office to free up space on your Mac.

Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates

This program moves away from your Mac and keeps your Mac as a purchase today. In addition, you can filter, distinguish and eject junk files from your Mac.

In addition, it is extremely basic and simple to use. With CleanMyMac Crack, you have to choose a file and drag it and trash. Too, After pulling, you can think that everything is done and you eject the application. However, it does not end when you drag a file to the trash can, a part of the shots cannot be ejected such as reservations, saved statuses, etc.

Ark building even walls

Therefore, you need a brilliant and solid software that can complete a powerful activity against this software and is the best decision for each Mac client. CleanMyMac X 4. Further, there are many other programs that are used to improve Mac exposure. Besides, each of the features is filled in one package.

Further, You can improve Mac execution and evacuate files and files that are a little too much. It also allows you to uninstall the application that makes the system slow down. It has all the features that are a requirement for Mac. It can scan and evacuate junk files effectively. The expansion menu is also a varied element. This ability allows you to deal with most of your expansion.

The interface is very easy to use, you do not need to bother with any notable ability to use it. Anyone can use it productively a nd raise the Mac display. CleanMyMac Crack evacuates all the remaining files and removes them from this application and ejects them from your Mac completely.I really could do with something that handles larger files.

I have a very large Mega Pixel image that I need to compress but this software won't touch anything over 60 Mega Pixels.

jpegmini mac crack

Very frustrating - why can't it?? This is by far, the best and easiest program I've used for image compression. Better than trying to figure out dimensions and compress your images directly with lightroom or photoshop. It will now become a permanent part of my lightroom work flow and for all my cloud storage uploading.

Super fast and easy.

jpegmini mac crack

I really like this product, one of my top 5 apps, a must have specially if you need to publish good photos on websites, they still look great but light and great to be seen in all equipments, such as tablets,mobile phones etc. Should have the option to create destination folder.

JPEGmini Pro Crack v2 With Activation Code Download

I have to be carefull, always copy and paste the files that i need to resize. Most of the times we resize images because we want to publish them, but we want to keep the originals for future projects. Read reply 1. Very good compression, with no apparent loss of image quality Copy checked against original in fine detail digitally. Best on larger images. Non pro version allows you add folders to process, but it's second step. Might consider using the pro version to allow images to be automatically saved in JPEGmini.

Also while counter shows how much space has been saved, it doesn't show how many photos have been processed. The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our site terms of use. If you believe this comment is offensive or violates the CNET's Site Terms of Useyou can report it below this will not automatically remove the comment.

Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed. Overview User Reviews Specs. With JPEGmini you can optimize all your photos to free up valuable hard drive space, and share full-resolution photos with your friends much faster. You can also use JPEGmini to store up to 5x more photos in your online photo accounts, and attach up to 5x more full resolution photos to your email messages.JPEGmini Pro Crack is the most modern and a very efficient program who allows you to manage your all the format images size and also enhanced the pixels of your images through this software features and the latest version of this software also compatible with your Adobe Lightroom 5 and also with Adobe Photoshop CC.

This program works very intelligently and does not make lose your image original format. This program takes action immediately on your demand. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. This latest version of this images editing tools is totally clean from bugs and also from minor issues. This program does not make your operating system harmful and works very efficiently.

A user can also use this program with the Adobe Photo CC as a plugin.

Uninstall doom emacs

Download the complete setup of this software on your operating system from the link. When the process of downloading of this program is finished on your operating system. Install your complete program on your operating system. When the procedure of installation of this program is finished on your OS.

Run your proper installed program on your operating system. This software is working amazingly. Window 7 Product Key. March 27, 0. March 3, 0. April 10, 0. Windows Password Recovery Tool Crack 6.

March 24, 0. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Notify me of follow-up comments by email.October 14, August 15, July 24, July 17, October 8, August 25, March 22, January 18, July 10, June 14, January 11, December 4, October 31, October 1, September 5, August 27, November 16, April 9, October 5, September 8, July 11, June 24, April 14, February 27, February 16, February 6, February 4, November 12, October 16, September 19, September 12, August 14, July 28, May 15, April 18, August 13, With the use of this software you can easily manage your image size with same quality.

Your file size become reduce but you can enjoy your images in high quality. In other words it provide all in one image optimization functions with wonderful results. There are so many features and functions which give your photos a new look as well as optimize them.

jpegmini mac crack

JPEGmini Pro Free provide comprehensive solution for photo optimization, manipulations, and delivery of photos as well. Professional users also use this software for their projects to get smallest file size of their images.

Its user friendly interface that is very easy and simple for all users. JPEGmini Online Free is most attractive tool that is trusted software for image perfectionists to make your images in low size with same quality. Moreover it have latest technology like patent image optimization without compromising quality.

JPEGmini is very fast tool which works very quickly in easy and simple way. You can use this software on all Windows operating system with 32 and 63 bit. So that you can control your images on advanced level because it have all in one functions and features. JPEGmini Pro Crack have latest advancement and control that is support a vast collection of images to manage with smallest photo size. It works without trading off the character. If you want to send to anyone a large collection of images than you have to need a tool for reduce the image size than its one of the best choice.

One you install this software on your system than you can resolve all problems about photo image size and also download Nitro Pro Crack. Your email address will not be published. Skip to content. Related posts: Pixelmator 3. Wondershare Filmora 8.


Источник: https://wiv.jayasudhacartela.pw/jpegmini-mac-crack.html
CleanMyMac Cracked

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Cracked Download is all-in-one package to awesomize your Mac. It cleans megatons of junk and makes your computer run faster. Just like it did on day one. CleanMyMac X Activation Code Crack chases junk in all corners of your macOS.

Read moreM4VGear DRM Media Converter 5.5.8 with Crack [2022]

CleanMyMac X Full Version Crack cleans unneeded files, like outdated caches, broken downloads, logs, and useless localizations. You can remove tons of clutter that lurks in iTunes, Mail, Photos, and even locate gigabytes of large hidden files.

Mac cleaning tools in CleanMyMac X License Key will cut the extra weight in seconds. Each time your Mac stalls, you got a full deck of speedup tools: Free up RAM, Maintenance scripts, controls for Login Items, Launch Agents, and Hung Applications. This will lessen your system load and tune the Mac for maximum performance. When your machine is productive, you too are productive.

CleanMyMac X Key Features:

  • Easy to use, user-friendly interface
  • Drag and drop nature
  • Slims universal binaries
  • Removes useless language translations
  • Most accurate application uninstallation
  • Quick and Secure file eraser
  • Manages widgets, plugins and preference panes
  • Erases garbage left from previously removed
    applications and widgets
  • Monitors your Trash helping you to uninstall
    trashed applications correctly
  • Keeps an eye on your removable devices to clean them
    up from junk service files

Supported Operation Systems:

  • OS X 10.10 or later 64-bit
cleanmymac-x-activation-number-8785164

Read moreDoc Converter Pro 5.1.1.26 Business with Crack Full Version [2022]

CleanMyMac X Activation Number Crack Free Download In order to make your Mac’s life more organized, you can easily uninstall and update. The first one completely deletes the apps you don’t need, and the second one immediately deletes all software. The wrong application will be completely deleted, and the new application will always arrive in time. This helps resolve software conflicts and keep the Mac forever young.

How to Crack or Activate CleanMyMac X Cracked?

  • First download the latest version.
  • Uninstall the previous version.
  • Note Turn off the Virus Guard.
  • After Download Unpack or extract the rar file and open setup.
  • Just install Pre activated setup.
  • After all of these enjoy the CleanMyMac X Latest Version 2022.

Author’s Final Remarks

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack is a perfect software for Windows, Mac, Android and iOS. This is very helpful for those whom need to expertise in the field. This crack version is only for the education purpose; therefore, we do not guarantee that it will work on your devices. However, it is strongly recommended that disable your antivirus and disconnect the internet then run the application with crack. CleanMyMac X Crack is very famous among the freelancer and digital advertiser because they used in their promotions and improve their skills. Hence, the author recommended to all of you using it and most important share it for all other whom can afford the price of it. It is totally free to download and no need to pay any cents to the company.

Disclaimer

Please read this disclaimer carefully before using [https://abbaspc.org] website operated by [AbbasPC]

The content displayed on the website is the intellectual property of the [AbbasPC]. You may not reuse, republish, or reprint such content without our written consent.

All information posted is merely for educational and informational purposes. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice. Should you decide to act upon any information on this website, you do so at your own risk.

While the information on this website has been verified to the best of our abilities, we cannot guarantee that there are no mistakes or errors.

We reserve the right to change this policy at any given time, of which you will be promptly updated. If you want to make sure that you are up to date with the latest changes, we advise you to frequently visit this page.

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack

Download Here

Related

Источник: https://abbaspc.org/cleanmymac-x-macos-full-cracked-latest-version/

Cleanmymac x activation code github -

CleanMyMac X 4 Crack 2021 Activation Number + Full License Key

CleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Crack 2021 is a very simple application to remove mac unnecessary and junk files from the system. Basically used to clean up your system and increase its working ability. With a stylish interface, it’s a user-friendly software for installing and uninstalling. You can use its drag and drop option to remove the junk files quickly. CleanMyMac X Crack 4.9.1 scans your whole system and finds the large and old file which is taking your lot or memory. After the scan, it also provides you a complete list and you can remove all of them.

CleanMyMac X Crack

In addition, most functions can store various information and directories. This method now assists clients in the development of areas. As you might be aware, keeping your machine lightweight is critical, and CleanMyMac X 4 Crack will help you with that. As a result, the Mac can be deleted from the files. Nonetheless, you can use it to delete these files.
CleanMyMac X 4.8.5 Crack Full Activation Number Code 2021

CleanMyMac X 4.9.1 License Key

Nevertheless, this may be very configurable for direct entry and helps to revive the house. Or place it in your powerful driving. Free Download CleanMyMac Crack here with just a click below. And after that quickly install your system. It is a very meaning full tool for all macOS users. MacOS program that provides you the best software program it’s good to make your Mac clear and quick. Active it with CleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Serial Key 2021. It is a wonderful maintainer of the Mac, so it offers good effective and good well-being enhancement.

Clean all of your system’s garbage files to free up memory and allow you complete access. It is both technical and user-friendly for all.

As a consequence, they unnecessarily take up their properties and even decelerate the effectiveness of the Mac. Since it’s fully free from the house window and Mac OS X will get the newest mannequin. Due to this fact, when the software program completes the scanning course. CleanMyMac 4 Crack can remove automatically or you can remove the unwanted files manually. It’s all of your choices. Reveals many choices for scanning your Mac, you simply choose it and click on it to scan. As well as, these are all obligatory for them to work correctly in your entire library checklist.

CleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Torrent

As well, the software program helps shield your MAC. It permits you to choose the report knowledge you solely must clear. In the given file, you can get the CleanMyMac Activation Number Generator for the activation of it Additionally, you perceive all of its operations when you set it up.

Nevertheless, all this resolution with the assistance of it. So, CleanMyMac Keygen might clear up these data files and within the outcomes, it might optimize your Mac. It offers full administration to deal with or configure your system settings. Due to this fact, the newest protects you from dangerous junk files that may create insufferable properties in your disk. CleanMyMac License Key possibly can safely and intelligently scan. Also, clean your entire system, delete massive quantities of unused report knowledge.

CleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Keygen

Reduce the number of iPhoto libraries as well. As a result, it will protect your computer from viruses, ransomware, and adware attacks. It should protect your information from harm or damage. CleanMyMac X Torrent is a fantastic software program for all users. And because of its ease of use and technical tools, anybody can use it. But don’t waste any time and press the bell.

CleanMyMac X 4 Crack Key Features:

  • So, clear all junk files and memory.
  • Delete the remaining report knowledge of the appliance.
  • Clean My Mac X Crack is good creativeness and body defenders.
  • This normally takes away the free disk cartridge.
  • All in-depth crashes and exceptions are fixing with it.
  • In truth, cleanmymac crack offers full customization assist.
  • In addition, there is a friendly portrait and a bodyguard.
  • The coding program is really easy to use.
  • After cleanup, there aren’t many options for sharing.
  • As a result, delete the software application completely from your Mac.
  • CleanMyMac X Activation Code helps in processing plugins.
  • Simply re-index the spotlight cleaning system.

What’s New?

  • CleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Crack
  • The newest safety algorithm.
  • Provide you with very deep Cleansing.
  • Non-permanent Halloween theme.
  • CleanMyMac X Mac Crack clear underneath sure circumstances
  • Carrying outdated report knowledge from the depths
  • Computerized replacement of this technique

System Requirement:

  • Mac: OS X 10.7/ 10.8/ 10.9/ 10.10/ 10.11.
  • RAM: 2 GB or above.

How can you Crack With CleanMyMac X Activation Number Txt

  • Click on the button below to Full Version CleanMyMac X Crack Download
  • Extract the file right here.
  • Run the given setup.
  • Now, wait for the installation.
  • Use the given code and click on the active button.
  • Then reboot the system.
  • Hence, get pleasure Clean My Mac Crack forever.

CleanMyMac Crack 4 With Activation Code Key

Summary

Reviewer

Meer

Review Date

Reviewed Item

CleanMyMac X Crack + Activation License Key

Author Rating

Software Name

CleanMyMac X Crack

Software Name

Mac+Windows

Software Category

Mac

Category: 20212022ActivatedMacWindowsTags: CleanMyMac 5 Crack, CleanMyMac Crack, CleanMyMac X 2021 Crack, CleanMyMac X 5 Crack, CleanMyMac X Activation Code, CleanMyMac X Activation Number, CleanMyMac X Crack, CleanMyMac X Keygen, CleanMyMac X License Key, CleanMyMac X TorrentИсточник: https://iamactivator.com/cleanmymac-x-crack-activation-code-2022/

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community ... a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,000 articles, 42,570,406 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia ... are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users ... 524 people ... And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,000

Cebuano 6,061,269

Swedish 2,875,133

German 2,633,307

French 2,374,875

Dutch 2,071,599

Russian 1,771,271

Spanish 1,731,740

Italian 1,726,497

Polish 1,496,868

Egyptian Arabic 1,376,598

Japanese 1,300,979

Vietnamese 1,270,091

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,531

Arabic 1,143,365

Ukrainian 1,123,197

Portuguese 1,077,389

Persian 846,650

Catalan 689,772

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization ... his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice ... and ... his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians ... remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency ... We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority ... (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish caching servers and back-end layer caching is done by Apache Traffic Server.[265]

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

CleanMyMac X 4.7.0 Crack Activation Number With Torrent Free Download (2021)

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack Activation Number With Keygen (2021)

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack is an amazing app for cleaning and optimizing any Mac. Through it, you can maintain, clean, optimize and secure your Mac system. The program enables you to remove all types of unnecessary junk files such as temp, trash, iTunes junk, mail attachments, corrupt file and more. Also, this cleaner makes memory space for other use. You can easily remove and delete any data with this software on Mac. What’s more, it keeps away the virus, malware, spyware, adware, and others from your system. CleanMyMac X Activation Numberimproves your system speed and provides faster boot time for better response to the software.

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack With Latest Keygen 2021 Free Download

Furthermore, It can scan every inch of your system with the built-in latest scanner. Its scanner is equipped with the latest searching technique for identifying the entire hidden file as well. Also, this app keeps your system safe and does not delete any of the files that are essential for running your system. Overall, disk clean pro-CleanMyMac XKeygen is the only best and most useful Mac optimization program with a health guard, speed booster, junk cleaner as well as protection from online threats.

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack Mac + Torrent Full Version 2021 Free Download

Also, it keeps your system safe and does not delete any of the files that are essential for running your system. In addition, it offers an alert feature to inform users of different messages. It offers a very easy to use and understand but elegant graphical user interface. You can use CleanMyMac Torrentwithout any knowledge or training. It offers complete functions with just a few clicks. Such as you can scan your complete system by pressing just one button Scan. And then clean all the files by pressing the clean button. Furthermore, it is very powerful, lightweight and resource-efficient. It does not slow down the processor while running. It has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac.

CleanmyMac Key Features

  • It is an all in one program for cleaning all kinds of junk data.
  • You can scan your system in full with one button click.
  • It allows you to remove the photo, temp files, iPhone files, broken files as well as trash bins data.
  • It has a large collection of all the rules and exceptions for only selecting noncritical files for deletion.
  • With the selection feature, a user can customize cleaning by only selecting a specific file format or files for cleaning.
  • It allows a user to optimize disk storage by freeing space for new data.
  • Removes any processes stuck in RAM and increases system performance.
  • It also provides email cleaning. Due to attachment mail becoming heavy and taking a lot of space with just one click you can remove all data from emails.
  • It enables users to completely control all the saved data on disk. With this, no data is hidden from the user view.

CleanmyMac Features

  • You can save a lot of memory by clearing the photo gallery without removing any image files. The image library not only contains images but large caches as well. Which occupies many gigabytes of memory this program removes or cleans these caches.
  • Same way iTune account or collection also has much more data than the saved tunes. With this, you can clear all useless and redundant data and free up space for new data.
  • Like house Mac also contain many trash bin. Each trash bin for a different type of file. With this tool, you can manage all these bins without any difficulty. You can clean all these app trash bins, image trash bin, mail trash bin, and many others.
  • You can use it as the application manager for completely removing any application from your system. Many times when you uninstall or delete an application from the system. Its associated or related data remain in your system which not only takes memory space but can also cause problems with your system. It allows you to remove all the data related to any application in a very easy way.
  • A lot of your data in the system is very private or confidential for users. Users do not want anyone to recover this data after deletion. This program offers features for removing data in such a way that there is no possibility of recovery.
  • Not only clean, but this tool also offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working. You can get complete performance, efficiency and health report of your system.

System Requirements

  • Mac OS X 11 or later
  • 64-bit, Intel processor

CleanMyMac Activation Number

  • QASWED4-R5T6Y7U8-I90OP-0O9I8U7
  • Y6T5R4-E3W23E4-R5T6Y78-UI90O9I8
  • U7Y6T5R4-E3SWE4-R5T6Y7-U8I90OO
  • 9I8U7Y6T5-R4DE4R-T56Y7U-I9O0I8U
  • HY76GT5-FRDESW-EDRT6YH-7UJIKOI

How to Crack CleanMyMac X?

  • First of all Download a Cracked Exe Here
  • Unzip it and forced to run
  • Now Click on Install a File
  • Wait for Installation
  • Then Click on Generate Serial Keys
  • Copy it and paste
  • Processes Done.

Related

CleaningMacOptimizerSoftware

apple m1 compatiblebest mac cleanerbest mac cleaning softwareclean my mac crackClean my Mac DownloadClean my Mac freeclean my mac serialClean my Mac X CrackCleaningCleanMyMaccleanmymac 2CleanMyMac 2019CleanMyMac 2020CleanMyMac 3cleanmymac 3 activation codecleanmymac 3 activation numbercleanmymac 3 crackcleanmymac 3 kickasscleanmymac 3 licenseCleanMyMac 4cleanmymac 4 activation codeCleanMyMac 4 crackCleanMyMac 4 freeCleanMyMac 4.6 12CleanMyMac 4.7 3 CrackCleanMyMac 4.8.2 free downloadcleanmymac activationCleanMyMac activation codecleanmymac activation keyCleanMyMac Activation Numbercleanmymac activation number freecleanmymac activation number txtcleanmymac alternativeCleanMyMac Classiccleanmymac couponCleanMyMac crackcleanmymac crack 2019cleanmymac crack codeCleanMyMac crack downloadCleanMyMac crack free downloadCleanMyMac crack keygencleanmymac crack youtubecleanmymac cracked 2021 downloadcleanmymac cracked downloadCleanMyMac downloadCleanMyMac download freecleanmymac freeCleanMyMac free downloadCleanMyMac free download 2021cleanmymac free licenseCleanMyMac full crackCleanMyMac keygencleanmymac licenseCleanMyMac License 2021CleanMyMac License 4.8.2cleanmymac license keycleanmymac reviewCleanMyMac review 2020CleanMyMac review 2021CleanMyMac torrentCleanMyMac Update 4.7.4CleanMyMac with crackCleanMyMac X 2021 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.5.3 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.5.4 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.6 10 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.6 15 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.6.12 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.1 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.2 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.3 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.4 Crackcleanmymac x 4.8 keycleanmymac x 4.8 tntCleanMyMac X 4.8.0CleanMyMac X 4.8.0 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.0 freeCleanMyMac X 4.8.1 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.2 Activation NumberCleanMyMac X 4.8.2 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.2 Crack Activation Numbercleanmymac x 4.8.3CleanMyMac X 4.8.3 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crackcleanmymac x 4.8.5CleanMyMac X 4.8.5 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.6 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.7 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.8CleanMyMac X 4.8.8 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.9 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Mac TorrentsCleanMyMac X 4.9.0 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.9.1 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Mac TorrentsCleanMyMac X 4.9.2 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.9.2 DownloadCleanMyMac X 4.9.2 With License KeyCleanMyMac X 5 Crackcleanmymac x activationCleanMyMac X Activation CodeCleanMyMac X Activation Code 2021CleanMyMac X Activation Code 4.8.1CleanMyMac X Activation Code downloadcleanmymac x activation code freecleanmymac x activation code generatorCleanMyMac X Activation Code GitHubCleanMyMac X activation code redditcleanmymac x activation keycleanmymac x activation key freeCleanMyMac X Activation Numbercleanmymac x activation number 2019cleanmymac x activation number 201cleanmymac x activation number 2019cleanmymac x activation number 2020cleanmymac x activation number generatorCleanMyMac X Activation number Generator onlinecleanmymac x activation number keygencleanmymac x activation number txtCleanMyMac x crackcleanmymac x crack 2020cleanmymac x crack itacleanmymac x crack passwordCleanMyMac X Crack RedditCleanMyMac X Crack TNTCleanMyMac X Crack versioncleanmymac x crackedcleanmymac x for macCleanMyMac X freeCleanMyMac X free 4.7.4CleanMyMac X free DownloadCleanMyMac X free KeygenCleanMyMac X free torrentcleanmymac x keycleanmymac x key 2021cleanmymac x keygencleanmymac x licensecleanmymac x license freecleanmymac x license keycleanmymac x license key freeCleanMyMac X Mac 4.6.3 Serial KeyCleanMyMac X Redditcleanmymac x serialcleanmymac x serial numbercleanmymac x torrentCrack Version of cleanmyMacdisk clean prodownload CleanMyMac 3.7.4Download CleanMyMac XDownload CleanMyMac X 4.9.0Download CleanMyMac X 4.9.2download cleanmymac x for freefree cleanmymacfree mac cleanerHow to get CleanMyMac X for freeHow to get CleanMyMac X for free 4.8.1is cleanmymac safemacpaw cleanmymac xsetapp downloadWhat is the latest version of CleanMyMac X

Источник: https://scracked.com/cleanmymac-crack-activation-number-free-download/

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack + Keygen [Latest Download 2022]

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Keygen Free Download is an amazing app for cleaning and optimizing any Mac. Through it, you can maintain, clean, optimize and secure your Mac system. The program enables you to remove all types of unnecessary junk files such as temp, trash, iTunes junk, mail attachments, corrupt file, and more. Also, this cleaner makes memory space for other use. CleanMyMac X Crack is the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac. It cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system. You can easily remove and delete any data with this software in Mac. What’s more, it keeps away the virus, malware, spyware, adware, and others from your system. This application improves your system speed and provides faster boot time for better response to the software.

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

The Latest Version of CleanMyMac X License Key 2022 is a complete package to optimize your Mac. Able to clean megaton trash and make your PC faster. Because it is multi-functional, you can call it macOS cleaner, performance monitor, malware removal, and rescuer. This software recognizes dozens of unnecessary file types and cleans them in nanoseconds. Your system contains a lot of useless files that need cleaning. Therefore, this application is the best recommendation for that purpose. It can clean system folders, photos, iTunes, mail, browsers, and big old files.

CleanMyMac X 2022 Crack Incl Activation Number Full Version: [Torrent]

Furthermore, CleanMyMac X Keygen Latest can scan every inch of your system with the built-in latest scanner. Its scanner is equipped with the latest searching technique for identifying the entire hidden file as well. Also, this app keeps your system safe and does not delete any of the files that are essential for running your system. Overall, CleanMyMac X 2021 Torrent is the only best and most useful Mac optimization program with a health guard, speed booster, junk cleaner as well as protection from online threats.

What’s Latest in CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Keygen?

  • The CleanMyMac X 4.6.10 Latest Version comes with some bug fixes where A number of crashes to improve application stability
  • Also, fixed issues that ignore system applications option disappeared from CleanMyMac’s Ignore List Preferences
  • Removal of Group Containers within Uninstaller when deleting the last app
  • There is a scan All option in CleanMyMac’s Action menu
  • Also, a New feedback form in the Help menu
  • Now, the low disk space alerts are not visible for DMG volumes
  • Also, fixed the cache files cleanup broke Ableton Preferences
  • The issue with Firefox cookies could not be found in the Privacy module
  • Safari cookies reappeared after removal

Helpful ScreenShots:-

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

Impressive Features Of CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack [Latest]:

  • Get 5X extra speed by free up RAM and manage login terms.
  • It is an all one program for cleaning all kinds of junk data easily and safely.
  • This app is offering you such a way that there is no possibility of recovery.
  • In sometimes account or collection also has much more data the saved tunes.
  • With this, you can clear all this useless data and free you more space.
  • Smart Scan is the best feature that permits you to optimize speed and manage all other tasks.
  • CleanMyMac X Crack allows all users to optimize disk storage by free up space for the new database.
  • Also, the update installs an application to its latest version and uninstalls damage apps.
  • This app allows you to remove any picture, template files, iPhone files broken files as well as bins data trash.
  • You can save your memory by clearing the photo gallery without removing any pictures and files.
  • You can scan your system quickly with one click A huge data in the system is very private or confidential for the user.

More Details About CleanMyMac X Crack Step By Step:

  1. if you are not aware of this application, dmg files need to be mounted to access what’s new in this application.
  2. Copy every file in the crack folder except for the keygen then paste your data in Cleanmymac primary directory.
  3. More than people are the ability to one-click clean an entire system, the same app to this keygen as you only required its Generate button once to give a number.
  4. Copy the activation number then start this application. Click on the active tab to ring out the license key window.
  5. Just paste the activation code in the text box where you are asked to enter it. Afterward, just click on the Activate button to finish.

CleanMyMac X Activation Number:

3D4F56H7G65FD43S3DF45KJ7H63D4F5G65D3S2345F6GH7G654DS2S345F67HG65F43456GYH7HG6

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 License Keys (2022) Latest:

ZFEDQ-TZFXE-TXVD5-GRZ2C-FIE3XJGYX5-FZTH6-UFZ3K-PGZ8A-TXFI3CTZK6-9XE2M-KUB4Z-VRUX6-INDZ2OTX4Z-MUR3C-TXO7J-KDK4C-EV4XEPKV5C-EVZF8-EVIG2-LUV4Z-TVP7BBG5FC3-UHE3D-FVTH6V-IJ5V-KI7CUY5CE4-INF4F-0CF4DH-DE8H-KIU67HY38B-I6F4D-INT5F4-UVFS-Y6V4

How to Crack CleanMyMac X?

  1. First, download CleanMyMac X Crack along with the setup.
  2. Install the program and don’t run it yet.
  3. Unzip and copy the crack files.
  4. You can Paste and replace these files in the installation folder.
  5. Activate to complete version.
  6. Enjoy this application.

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022 Download From Links Given Below;

Mirror Link!

Posted in Antivirus, Mac, OptimizationTagged cleanmymac activation code, cleanmymac activation number, cleanmymac crack, cleanmymac keygen, cleanmymac license key, cleanmymac torrent, cleanmymac x 2021 Crack, CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack, cleanmymac x activation code, cleanmymac x activation code 2021, cleanmymac x activation code github, cleanmymac x activation number txt, cleanmymac x crack, cleanmymac x crack 2019, CleanMyMac X Crack 2020, cleanmymac x crack 4.6.3, cleanmymac x crack 4.7.2, cleanmymac x crack activation number, cleanmymac x crack big sur, cleanmymac x crack dmg, CleanMyMac X Crack key, cleanmymac x crack reddit, cleanmymac x crack tnt, cleanmymac x crack youtube, cleanmymac x cracked dmg, cleanmymac x free, cleanmymac x full version free, cleanmymac x keygen, macpaw cleanmymac x crackИсточник: https://cracxsofts.com/cleanmymac-x-crack-free-download/

CleanMyMac X Crack With Full Activation Code [Latest]CleanMyMac Activation Number

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2Crack is the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac that is developed by “Mac Paw Company”. It looks great in appearance and is simply easy to understand. That software cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system.  You can instantly remove unnecessary, unusual, useless junk files, corrupt files trash, and free up a lot of memory space. In addition, it has all the advanced techniques for removing junk data and has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac system. It saves the different rules of the database system and also knows what should be scanned or what should not. No file can hide from this scanning algorithm. It scans every inch of your system with its thorough and comprehensive scanner and then cleans all the files by pressing just one button.

CleanMyMac Keygen is software that increases system performance and speed. When talking about any mac issue, fixing it usually takes hours but installing the CleanMyMac X Crack is not going to happen because its development makes it so accessible and informative. Besides, No data can hide from users’ views. This application keeps your Mac clean without any bug or issue like the newly installed Mac system. It also shows all the data of old files that you have never seen a long time ago.

CleanMyMac X Activation Number Full Crack

CleanMyMac Activation Numberis fairly simple anyone can use it without any knowledge or training. It is an outstanding tool to eliminate junk data and doesn’t allow Mac OS to slow down the processor while running it. Moreover, it allows the user to classify which file they want to delete and which they want to keep. Also, it gives the opportunity to completely uninstall the installed program and safely erase its related data files, without the choice of recovering them later. When it is running you do not need to worry about clearing or cleaning procedures. CleanMyMac Full Crack contains the latest tools for system maintenance and level of privacy with full efficiency and accuracy. Also, It removes every process stuck in RAM and increases the performance of your system so that the system becomes more stable and runs much faster.

CleanMyMac Crack

CleanMyMac X Crack Features:

CleanMyMac X is for the cleaning of all kinds of junk data without any complications.

If users do not want anyone to recover their private or confidential data after deletion then this program has a feature that removes data in such a way that there is no chance of recovery.

Like house Mac also have many trash bin and each is for a different type of file. You can manage and clean all these app trash bins, image trash bins, mail trash bins, and many others without any difficulty.

With CleanMyMac X, you can clear all the useless and redundant data in your iTunes account and free up space for new data

It is an application manager for completely removing any application that causes problems with your system and also removes all the data related to that application.

In Addition, You can remove all data from emails that take a lot of memory space with just one click.

This tool offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working and can also help you get complete efficiency, performance, and health report of your system.

CleanMyMac X Crack allows you to get rid of photos junk, temp files, iPhone files, broken files, and also for trash bins data.

The menu bar widget comes up with a new design that shows you the more defined and detailed information.

CleanMyMac X Full Keygen tracks all the applications that are running behind and stops them and speeds up the performance of your Mac.

The malware scanner tracks your Mac folders in-depth and removes all kinds of susceptible activities.

Furthermore, When you proceed for a scan, a bubble-like chat appears in CleanMyMac on the screen with other additional suggestions to remove the junk that you may want to do next. Also, You can find it on the top of the right side corner at any time by clicking on it for suggestions.

This new functionality can view all the updates that are required. This app or outside the app in the Mac store needs an update.

Also Download: CCleaner Pro Crack

CleanMyMac X Activation Keys

R567Y-UHGFD-RT56T-YGHFD-ER456

GFDSE-456YT-GFDSE-W456Y-GFDRE

78YT7-89OIK-JHGFT-Y78IJ-HEFTY9

CleanMyMac Activation Code

34SW3-45RDE-4567U-HGFRT-5678I

KJHGY-789OK-JHUY8-9POLE-RT5YH

GFER5-EGRET-5YTYH-GFGRE-R23TR

How to install CleanMyMac X Crack?

  1. Download the setup of CleanMyMac X Crack.
  2. Then, Install it.
  3. Copy crack files.
  4. Now, Paste and replace it into the installation folder.
  5. Activate the complete version
  6. Finally, enjoy it for a lifetime.
Источник: https://letcracks.com/cleanmymac-x-crack-code-2022/

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack Full Keygen With Torrent [Latest]

CleanMyMac XCrack is a the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac that is developed by “Mac Paw Company”. It looks great in appearance and is simply easy to understand. That software cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system.  You can instantly remove unnecessary, unusual, useless junk files, corrupt files trash, and frees up a lot of memory space. In addition, it has all the advanced techniques for removing junk data and has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac system. It saves the different rules of the database system and also knows what should be scanned or what should not. No file can hide from this scanning algorithm. It scans every inch of your system with its thorough and comprehensive scanner and then cleans all the files by pressing just one button.

CleanMyMac X Crack

CleanMyMac Keygen is software that increases system performance and speed. When talking about any mac issue, fixing it usually takes hours but installing the CleanMyMac X Crack is not going to happen because its development makes it so accessible and informative. Besides, No data can hide from users’ view with it. This application keeps your Mac clean without any bug or issue like the newly installed Mac system. It also shows all the data of old files that you have never seen a long time ago.

CleanMyMac X Crack With Free Activation Number 2022

Additionally, CleanMyMac Activation Number is a reliable and very convenient software for Mac. It has all the features that are a need for Mac. You can Scan and remove junk files easily. The extensive menu is also a numerous feature. This function allows you to manage all of your extensions. The interface is very user-friendly; you don’t need any unique skills to use it. Anyone can efficiently use it and boost the performance of Mac. This program removes all the remaining files and junks of this application and removes it from your Mac completely. You can also detect outdated and corrupt software to keep your Mac updated.

There is much other software that is used to enhance the performance of Mac. All have many functions, but CleanMyMac X Torrent is the best software for Mac as all the features are filled in one packet. You can improve Mac performance and remove the files and documents that are not necessary. It also allows you to uninstall the application that causes the system to slower.

CleanMyMac X Mac Activation key Full Crack

CleanMyMac Activation Number is fairly simple anyone can use it without any knowledge or training. It is an outstanding tool to eliminate junk data and doesn’t allow Mac OS to slow down the processor while running it. Moreover, it allows the user to classify which file they want to delete and which they want to keep. Also, it gives the opportunity to completely uninstall the installed program and safely erase its related data files, without the choice of recovering them later. When it is running you do not need to worry about clearing or cleaning procedures. CleanMyMac Full Crack contains the latest tools for system maintenance and level of privacy with full efficiency and accuracy. Also, It removes every process stuck in RAM and increases the performance of your system so that the system becomes more stable and runs much faster.

Scheduled Cleaning:

CleanMyMac X Crack offers you to create a schedule for cleaning Mac. You have a great idea of your Mac that what is the need of your Mac. it will notify you whenever the cleaning is required. This application allows you to adjust a schedule of various stages like one week, two weeks, a month, and three months. The schedule program clean system when the scheduling date occurs.

How Does It Work?

If you want to see how your Mac is working? You need to open it. All the system running files are shown, and you can manage all of them. This application also provides the facility to maintain a hard disk, memory usage, and battery status. It also notifies you that causes a system failure.

Useful Features of CleanMyMac Torrent Mac:

  • It Checks everything on your Mac like framework, photos, trash, iTunes, Old Organizers, and Email accounts. After this, you can easily understand what you need to do with these files. You can select files that are useless and make your Mac free.
  • You can put your photos in iCloud. These files are covered in your Photos Album. You can also reserve documents stack up on Mac.
  • This application allows you to create schedules to manage your Mac system. By managing your Mac all, you don’t need to worry about your Mac cleaning manual.
  • It provides you to manage the extension of your Mac. This feature is perfect for your Mac. You can remove any of the extra extension that is installed by some sudden works.
  • Also, you can increase the performance of the Mac system. It provides you with fixing all the bugs and uninstalls the unusable apps. So that your Mac work properly
  • The program also offers you to clean hard disks. You can see memory usage, hard disk space, and battery status. All of this feature is handy for your Mac system.

What’s New in CleanMyMac X 4.8.9?

  • Some bugs were fixed and increased performance.
  • Also, I added some new features.
  • Temporary Christmas themes are added to it.
  • Disk Representation is improved. Now free is replace with available.
  • Help and Around sectors are also enhanced.
  • Due to Compatibility issues, the starting verification of Disk is restricted To APFS.
  • All the well-known crashes and exclusions are fixed.

CleanMyMac X Crack Keygen

CleanMyMac Crack Features:

This program is for the cleaning of all kinds of junk data without any complications.

If users do not want anyone to recover their private or confidential data after deletion then this program has a feature that removes data in such a way that there is no chance of recovery.

Like house Mac also have many trash bin and each is for a different type of files. You can manage and clean all these app trash bins, image trash bins, mail trash bins, and many others without any difficulty.

With this application, you can clear all the useless and redundant data in your iTunes account and free up space for new data

It is an application manager for completely removing any application that causes problems with your system and also removes all the data related to that application.

In Addition, You can remove all data from emails that take a lot of memory space with just one click.

This tool offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working and can also help you get complete efficiency, performance, and health report of your system.

This application allows you to get rid of photos junk, temp files, iPhone files, broken files, and also for trash bins data.

The menu bar widget comes up with a new design that shows you the more defined and detailed information.

CleanMyMac X Full Keygen tracks all the applications that are running behind and stops them and speeds up the performance of your Mac.

The malware scanner tracks your Mac folders in-depth and removes all kinds of susceptible activities.

Furthermore, When you proceed for a scan, a bubble-like chat appears in CleanMyMac on the screen with other additional suggestions to remove the junk that you may want to do next. Also, You can find it on the top of the right side corner at any time by clicking on it for suggestions.

This new functionality can view all the updates that are required. This app or outside the app in the Mac store needs an update.

CleanMyMac X Activation Keys

R567Y-UHGFD-RT56T-YGHFD-ER456

GFDSE-456YT-GFDSE-W456Y-GFDRE

78YT7-89OIK-JHGFT-Y78IJ-HEFTY9

CleanMyMac Activation Code

34SW3-45RDE-4567U-HGFRT-5678I

KJHGY-789OK-JHUY8-9POLE-RT5YH

GFER5-EGRET-5YTYH-GFGRE-R23TR

What’s New in CleanMyMac X 4.8.9?

  • Some bugs were fixed and increased performance.
  • Also, I added some new features.
  • Temporary Christmas themes are added to it.
  • Disk Representation is improved. Now free is replace with available.
  • Help and Around sectors are also enhanced.
  • Due to Compatibility issues, the starting verification of Disk is restricted To APFS.
  • All the well-known crashes and exclusions are fixed.

How to Crack?

  1. Install the crack file and .exe file available below
  2. Extract the file and install it
  3. After installation, run the application
  4. You see that it automatically activates.
  5. There is nothing to do furthermore.
  6. Now enjoy the crack software!

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022 (Mac+Win) From The Links Below.

Download Now

Related

Источник: https://getmacsoftware.com/cleanmymac-x-crack/

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack Full Keygen With Torrent [Latest]

CleanMyMac XCrack is a the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac that is developed by “Mac Paw Company”. It looks great in appearance and is simply easy to understand. That software cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system.  You can instantly remove unnecessary, unusual, useless junk files, corrupt files trash, and frees up a lot of memory space. In addition, it has all the advanced techniques for removing junk data and has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac system. It saves the different rules of the database system and also knows what should be scanned or what should not. No file can hide from this scanning algorithm. It scans every inch of your system with its thorough and comprehensive scanner and then cleans all the files by pressing just one button.

CleanMyMac X Crack

CleanMyMac Keygen is software that increases system performance and speed. When talking about any mac issue, fixing it usually takes hours but installing the CleanMyMac X Crack is not going to happen because its development makes it so accessible and informative. Besides, No data can hide from users’ view with it. This application keeps your Mac clean without any bug or issue like the newly installed Mac system. It also shows all the data of old files that you have never seen a long time ago.

CleanMyMac X Crack With Free Activation Number 2022

Additionally, CleanMyMac Activation Number is a reliable and very convenient software for Mac. It has all the features that are a need for Mac. You can Scan and remove junk files easily. The extensive menu is also a numerous feature. This function allows you to manage all of your extensions. The interface is very user-friendly; you don’t need any unique skills to use it. Anyone can efficiently use it and boost the performance of Mac. This program removes all the remaining files and junks of this application and removes it from your Mac completely. You can also detect outdated and corrupt software to keep your Mac updated.

There is much other software that is used to enhance the performance of Mac. All have many functions, but CleanMyMac X Torrent is the best software for Mac as all the features are filled in one packet. You can improve Mac performance and remove the files and documents that are not necessary. It also allows you to uninstall the application that causes the system to slower.

CleanMyMac X Mac Activation key Full Crack

CleanMyMac Activation Number is fairly simple anyone can use it without any knowledge or training. It is an outstanding tool to eliminate junk data and doesn’t allow Mac OS to slow down the processor while running it. Moreover, it allows the user to classify which file they want to delete and which they want to keep. Also, it gives the opportunity to completely uninstall the installed program and safely erase its related data files, without the choice of recovering them later. When it is running you do not need to worry about clearing or cleaning procedures. CleanMyMac Full Crack contains the latest tools for system maintenance and level of privacy with full efficiency and accuracy. Also, It removes every process stuck in RAM and increases the performance of your system so that the system becomes more stable and runs much faster.

Scheduled Cleaning:

CleanMyMac X Crack offers you to create a schedule for cleaning Mac. You have a great idea of your Mac that what is the need of your Mac. it will notify you whenever the cleaning is required. This application allows you to adjust a schedule of various stages like one week, two cleanmymac x activation code github, a month, and three months. The schedule program clean system when the scheduling date occurs.

How Does It Work?

If you want to see how your Mac is working? You need to open it. All the system running files are shown, and you can manage all of them. This application also provides the facility to maintain a hard disk, memory usage, and battery status. It also notifies you that causes a system failure.

Useful Features of CleanMyMac Torrent Mac:

  • It Checks everything on your Mac like framework, photos, trash, iTunes, Old Organizers, and Email accounts. After this, you can easily understand what you need to do with these files. You can select files that are useless and make your Mac free.
  • You can put your photos in iCloud. These files are covered in your Photos Album. You can also reserve documents stack up on Mac.
  • This application allows you to create schedules to manage your Mac system. By managing your Mac all, you don’t need to worry about your Mac cleaning manual.
  • It provides you to manage the extension of your Mac. This feature is perfect for your Mac. You can remove any of the extra extension that is installed by some sudden works.
  • Also, you can increase the performance of the Mac system. It provides you with fixing all the bugs and uninstalls the unusable apps. So that your Mac work properly
  • The program also offers you to clean hard disks. You can see memory usage, hard disk space, and battery status. All of this feature is handy for your Mac system.

What’s New in CleanMyMac X 4.8.9?

  • Some bugs were fixed and increased performance.
  • Also, I added some new features.
  • Temporary Christmas themes are added to it.
  • Disk Representation is improved. Now free is replace with available.
  • Help and Around sectors are also enhanced.
  • Due to Compatibility issues, the starting verification of Disk is restricted To APFS.
  • All the well-known crashes and exclusions are fixed.

CleanMyMac X Crack Keygen

CleanMyMac Crack Features:

This program is for the cleaning of all kinds of junk data without any complications.

If users do not want anyone to recover their private or confidential data after deletion then this program has a feature that removes data in such a way that there is no chance of recovery.

Like house Mac also have many trash bin and each is for a different type of files. You can manage and clean all these app trash bins, image trash bins, mail trash bins, and many others without any difficulty.

With this application, you can clear all the useless and redundant data in your iTunes account and free up space for new data

It is an application manager for completely removing any application that causes problems with your system and also removes all the data related to that application.

In Addition, You can remove all data from emails that take a lot of memory space with just one click.

This tool offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working and can also help you get complete efficiency, performance, and health report of your system.

This application allows you to get rid of photos junk, temp files, iPhone files, broken files, and also for trash bins data.

The menu bar widget comes up with a new design that shows you the more defined and detailed information.

CleanMyMac X Full Keygen tracks all the applications that are running behind and stops them and speeds up the performance of your Mac.

The malware scanner tracks your Mac folders in-depth and removes all kinds of susceptible activities.

Furthermore, When you proceed for a scan, a bubble-like chat appears in CleanMyMac on the screen with other additional suggestions to remove the junk that you may want to do next. Also, You can find it on the top of the right side corner at any time by clicking on it for suggestions.

This new functionality can view all the updates that are required. This app or outside the app in the Mac store needs an update.

CleanMyMac X Activation Keys

R567Y-UHGFD-RT56T-YGHFD-ER456

GFDSE-456YT-GFDSE-W456Y-GFDRE

78YT7-89OIK-JHGFT-Y78IJ-HEFTY9

CleanMyMac Activation Code

34SW3-45RDE-4567U-HGFRT-5678I

KJHGY-789OK-JHUY8-9POLE-RT5YH

GFER5-EGRET-5YTYH-GFGRE-R23TR

What’s New in CleanMyMac X 4.8.9?

  • Some bugs were fixed and increased performance.
  • Also, I added some new features.
  • Temporary Christmas themes are added to it.
  • Disk Representation is improved. Now free is replace with available.
  • Help and Around sectors are also enhanced.
  • Due to Compatibility issues, the starting verification of Disk is restricted To APFS.
  • All the well-known crashes and exclusions are fixed.

How to Crack?

  1. Install the crack file and .exe file available below
  2. Extract the file and install it
  3. After installation, run the application
  4. You see that it automatically activates.
  5. There is nothing to do furthermore.
  6. Now enjoy the crack software!

CleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022 (Mac+Win) From The Links Below.

Download Now

Related

Источник: https://getmacsoftware.com/cleanmymac-x-crack/

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack + Keygen [Latest Download 2022]

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Keygen Free Download is an amazing app for cleaning and optimizing any Mac. Through it, you can maintain, clean, optimize and secure your Mac system. The program enables you to remove all types of unnecessary junk files such as temp, trash, iTunes junk, mail attachments, corrupt file, and more. Also, this cleaner makes memory space for other use. CleanMyMac X Crack is the best application and powerful tool for cleaning and optimizing your Mac. It cleans, secures, optimizes, stabilizes, and maintains your Mac system. You can easily remove and delete any data with this software in Mac. What’s more, it keeps away the virus, malware, spyware, adware, and others from your system. This application improves your system speed and provides faster boot time for better response to the software.

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

The Latest Version of CleanMyMac X License Key 2022 is a complete package to optimize your Mac. Able to clean megaton trash and make your PC faster. Because it is multi-functional, you can call it macOS cleaner, performance monitor, malware removal, and rescuer. This software recognizes dozens of unnecessary file types and cleans them in nanoseconds. Your system contains a lot of useless files that need cleaning. Therefore, this application is the best recommendation for that purpose. It can clean system folders, photos, iTunes, mail, browsers, and big old files.

CleanMyMac X 2022 Crack Incl Activation Number Full Version: [Torrent]

Furthermore, CleanMyMac X Keygen Latest can scan every inch of your system with the built-in latest scanner. Its scanner is equipped with the latest searching technique for identifying the entire hidden file as well. Also, this app keeps your system safe and does not delete any of the files that are essential for running your system. Overall, CleanMyMac X 2021 Torrent is the only best and most useful Mac optimization program with a health guard, speed booster, junk cleaner as well as protection from online threats.

What’s Latest in CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Keygen?

  • The CleanMyMac X 4.6.10 Latest Version comes with some bug fixes where A number of crashes to improve application stability
  • Also, fixed issues that ignore system applications option disappeared from CleanMyMac’s Ignore List Preferences
  • Removal of Group Containers within Uninstaller when deleting the last app
  • There is a scan All option in CleanMyMac’s Action menu
  • Also, a New feedback form in the Help menu
  • Now, the low disk space alerts are not visible for DMG volumes
  • Also, fixed the cache files cleanup broke Ableton Preferences
  • The issue with Firefox cookies could not be found in the Privacy module
  • Safari cookies reappeared after removal

Helpful ScreenShots:-

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022

Impressive Features Of CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack [Latest]:

  • Get 5X extra speed by free up RAM and manage login terms.
  • It is an all one program for cleaning all kinds of junk data easily and safely.
  • This app is offering you such a way that there is no possibility of recovery.
  • In sometimes account or collection also has much more data the saved tunes.
  • With this, you can clear all this useless data and free you more space.
  • Smart Scan is the best feature that permits you to optimize speed and manage all other tasks.
  • CleanMyMac X Crack allows all users to optimize disk storage by free up space for the new database.
  • Also, the update installs an application to its latest version and uninstalls damage apps.
  • This app allows you to remove any picture, template files, iPhone files broken files as well as bins data trash.
  • You can save your memory by clearing the photo gallery without removing any pictures and files.
  • You can scan your system quickly with one click A huge data in the system is very private or confidential for the user.

More Details About CleanMyMac X Crack Step By Step:

  1. if you are not aware of this application, dmg files need to be mounted to access what’s new in this application.
  2. Copy every file in the crack folder except for the keygen then paste your data in Cleanmymac primary directory.
  3. More than people are the ability to one-click clean an entire system, the same app to this keygen as you only required its Generate button once to give a number.
  4. Copy the activation number then start this application. Click on the active tab to ring out the license key window.
  5. Just paste the activation code in the text box where you are asked to enter it. Afterward, just click on the Activate button to finish.

CleanMyMac X Activation Number:

3D4F56H7G65FD43S3DF45KJ7H63D4F5G65D3S2345F6GH7G654DS2S345F67HG65F43456GYH7HG6

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 License Keys (2022) Latest:

ZFEDQ-TZFXE-TXVD5-GRZ2C-FIE3XJGYX5-FZTH6-UFZ3K-PGZ8A-TXFI3CTZK6-9XE2M-KUB4Z-VRUX6-INDZ2OTX4Z-MUR3C-TXO7J-KDK4C-EV4XEPKV5C-EVZF8-EVIG2-LUV4Z-TVP7BBG5FC3-UHE3D-FVTH6V-IJ5V-KI7CUY5CE4-INF4F-0CF4DH-DE8H-KIU67HY38B-I6F4D-INT5F4-UVFS-Y6V4

How to Crack CleanMyMac X?

  1. First, download CleanMyMac X Crack along with the setup.
  2. Install the program and don’t run it yet.
  3. Unzip and copy the crack files.
  4. You can Paste and replace these files in the installation folder.
  5. Activate to complete version.
  6. Enjoy this application.

CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack Incl Activation Number Full 2022 Download From Links Given Below;

Mirror Link!

Posted in Antivirus, Mac, OptimizationTagged cleanmymac activation code, cleanmymac activation number, cleanmymac crack, cleanmymac keygen, cleanmymac license key, cleanmymac torrent, cleanmymac x 2021 Crack, CleanMyMac X 4.8.7 Crack, cleanmymac x activation code, cleanmymac x activation code 2021, cleanmymac x activation code github, cleanmymac x activation number txt, cleanmymac x crack, cleanmymac x crack 2019, CleanMyMac X Crack 2020, cleanmymac x crack 4.6.3, cleanmymac x crack 4.7.2, cleanmymac x crack activation number, cleanmymac x crack big sur, cleanmymac x crack dmg, CleanMyMac X Crack key, cleanmymac x crack reddit, cleanmymac x crack tnt, cleanmymac x crack youtube, cleanmymac x cracked dmg, cleanmymac x free, cleanmymac x full version free, cleanmymac x keygen, macpaw cleanmymac x crackИсточник: https://cracxsofts.com/cleanmymac-x-crack-free-download/

If you are reading this article, the chances are that you have a problem: your Mac is running slow.

And chances are you read about CleanMyMac (read my review here) and how it can make your Mac run faster.

And finally, you also read multiple “expert” user reviews suggesting that CleanMyMac is a scam or a malware.

I decided to find out if the rumors are true or not on my own. Because I don’t like spreading rumors, I prefer hard facts. If I claim that something is not working, it means I tested it myself, and it didn’t work. Conversely, if I claim that something works, I tested, and it worked.

So, let’s do some research and see what we can find.

In general, it is safe to download and install CleanMyMac from the App Store because Apple will not host harmful programs. However, some CleanMyMac functions may not be safe to use by inexperienced users. For instance, when the app deletes certain files, it may bring your Mac to an unstable state.

Note: this article is not about whether you should or shouldn’t purchase CleanMyMac. I will post a detailed review later and provide a link for those who interested. This post is intended to answer the question in the title.

Is MacPaw a Legit Company

CleanMyMac X is a product of MacPaw, a company with offices in Kyiv, Ukraine, and Santa Barbara, CA. It was founded in 2008 by Oleksandr Kosovan, a Ukranian developer.

Since then, MacPaw added several other applications, most notably a subscription-based service Setapp. By the way, Setapp was named World’s most innovative company in Europe 2019 according to FastCompany.

The company was also featured in Forbes, 9to5mac, TechCrunch and VentureBeat.

So, yes, MacPaw is a legit company and recognized by many reputable organizations.

By the way, the funniest claim I read on forums is the assertion that MacPaw works for Russian intelligence.

I don’t want to go too deep in politics, but let me remind you that Ukraine is in the middle of a conflict with Russia, and it’s hard to imagine that Russians can influence a company in the capital of Ukraine.

Moreover, reportedly the founder of the company risked his life by supporting civic protests in 2014 against the corrupt government. So, no, I don’t believe MacPaw is associated with any government.

Is CleanMyMac Malware

There is a very known myth that Apple computers cannot get viruses, but more experienced users know that this is not true.

Macs do get viruses and other types of malware. If you ever had to fight with annoying pop-ups after installing a new app or an extension in Chrome, you know what I mean.

Whenever I download any software over the internet I always go thru following steps to make sure that I am not getting a malware:

Both VirusTotal and Norton assured that CleanMyMac is not a malware, or adware, or spyware of any sort.

Why is CleanMyMac not in App Store

Smart users know that it is best to install apps from the Mac App Store.

When a developer submits an app to the Mac App Store, Apple performs tests and validates the app to make sure that it does not contain any malicious code.

So, by submitting their app to the App Store, the developers get a stamp of approval from Apple itself. And any user knows, that any app downloaded from the App Store is secure, it is not a scam or spyware, it is OK to download and use.

But how does Apple guarantee that all apps in their store are safe? By limiting their access to many parts of the macOS. It is called a sandbox. Each app is placed in a cleanmymac x activation code github area where they cannot cause any problems to the system and other programs running on the computer.

And this is a problem for applications such as CleanMyMac.

Since CleanMyMac X needs access to the core, it cannot run in a sandbox in order to be effective. If you are still not convinced, try to find any antivirus program in the Mac App Store.

If you want to install antimalware solutions from McAfee, Bitdefender, or Norton, you have to download them from their sites. It’s because any application that needs to have access to the system files cannot run in a sandbox.

There are two other reasons for developers to encourage downloading from their sites:

  1. Apple takes 30% cut from any purchase in its store, so the developers either have to increase their prices by 30% or eat the cost of hosting.
  2. Bypassing App store allows developers to have creative licensing solutions. For instance, they can offer a trial version and then unlock the full version after you obtain the license.

In short, I am not surprised by the fact that CleanMyMac is not available for download from the App Store because it is a common practice for programs that work on the system level.

However, MacPaw is not totally bypassing Apple checks with its products. CleanMyMac X is Apple notarized. What does it mean?

Unlike submitting the program to the App Store, where it undergoes a full review (and nobody really knows what happens behind the doors), notarization is an automatic service.

When building and assembling the final version of the product, developers can send it to the Apple notary service. The service will check for any malicious code, and if nothing wrong was found, it would issue a ticket. This ticket is verified when the app gets installed on Mac.

When a user downloads and tries to install an app notarized by Apple, she will see the message that looks like a warning. The main message is the same as with any app downloaded from the internet: ‘”Blah blah app” is an app downloaded from the internet. Are you sure you cleanmymac x activation code github to open it?’

The difference is in a fine print below the main message: “Apple checked it for malware software, and none was found.”

As you can see Apple admitted that CleanMyMac X was checked for malware software and none was found.

CleanMyMac check for malicious software

Note: this screenshot is from a Mac running on macOS Mojave. In Catalina, the message is different, possibly because starting with Catalina, Apple promised not to allow to run un-notarized apps.

Why Are There So Many Negative Reviews on Forums

But, how about a great number of negative reviews on the internet?

Why every time someone asks whether to install CleanMyMac or not, there is always an expert who’s working with Mac for twenty years, and they claim that your Mac will melt as soon as you install the program?

Or, there is always an “Apple tech,” who suggests to immediately restore your Time machine backup from before you installed the application.

I believe there are several explanations:

1. CleanMyMac often gets confused with MacDefender and MacKeeper

I didn’t review MacKeeper yet, so I can’t tell if it’s a good program or not. Once I install and use it, I will provide a link for my review.

At this point, all I know about the company that sells MacKeeper is that there was a class-action lawsuit claiming that the company deceived users into paying for unneeded fixes.

Another well-known app MacDefender, is a type of malware. It gets your credit card information for fraud purposes, and Apple even provided instructions on how to remove it. The other names of the malware are MacGuard, MacDefender, MacProtector, and MacSecurity.

After having issues with these apps, users became very uneasy about any cleaning tools, including CleanMyMac.

2. There were cases when CleanMyMac deleted the wrong files

When reading user reviews, I found several cases when user-provided screenshots of damage caused by earlier versions of CleanMyMac.

I am a software engineer myself, and I know that all programs have bugs.

For instance, my favorite Windows version of all time is Windows XP. When it was first released, it was a total disaster – people were not able to run most of the applications after the upgrade for months. And this is the main product of Microsoft, a 100 bln dollar company.

Apparently, MacPaw learned from their mistakes, and now they have the Safety Database – list of files that should not be deleted. And after 12 years on the market, any software becomes stable. 

If you are asking if there is a risk that a wrong file can be deleted by CleanMyMac, my answer is: there is always a risk that ANY cleaning software can do that.

However, I believe the probability of this happening is extremely for software that has 12-year history compared to a new program without such long experience.

3. Experts believe that everything done by CleanMyMac can be done manually

I agree with this point. In fact, I wrote a post on how to clean the disk on Mac without any software.

As always, there are two caveats.

First, I am a very technical person.

I understand how the software works because I’ve been developing commercial software for twenty years. I know which files are safe to delete and which are not. I know how to use various system tools, and I know a lot about Macs. Otherwise, I would not be running this site.

For someone less technical than me, doing everything that I do may not be too easy. So, having an app that does the same, but without requiring in-depth knowledge is worth paying for the app.

Second, the manual cleaning process is quite tedious.

To understand how much work it is, let me explain in the next example. I have two grills: charcoal and gas. For the last two years, I use the gas grill in 90% cases.

While the charcoal grill is superior in the end result, it takes a lot of time and effort to light the coals and even more time to clean. I use the charcoal grill on certain occasions, but prefer the gas grill for the convenience it provides. I hope you understand what I mean.

Now, when I laid out all the facts I was able to find during my research, I am finally ready to make a conclusion.

Is CleanMyMac X Safe?

CleanMyMac is safe to download, install, and use. It’s a product built by a well known Ukranian company MacPaw, which has other products as well.

CleanMyMac X is not a virus or spyware. It is Apple notarized, which means Apple scanned its code and found no malicious components.

Moreover, CleanMyMac is now available in the Apple App Store, and Apple obviously will not distribute malicious software.

Additionally, CleanMyMac maintains the Safety Database – a database of files that cannot be deleted, which reduces the chances of removing data required for macOS and other program operations.

To avoid getting malware, download any app directly from the company sites. Avoid downloading anything from sites such as cnet dot com, macupdate dot com and others.

Always check the DMG files on VirusTotal or with a good antivirus (Norton, McAfee, Bitdefender, etc.)

Want to know more? Read my in-depth review of CleanMyMac X.

Also, check out:
Previous article: CleanMyMac vs. AppCleaner: Which Uninstaller is the Best

Источник: https://macmyths.com/is-cleanmymac-x-safe/

CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crack + Full Activation Number 2021 [100% Working]

CleanMyMac X 4.5.1 Activation Number

CleanMyMac X Crack  Free is the most powerful software to clean malware, virus, rogues, and malicious apps. It heals all malicious activities. It provides safe and secure browsing. You can share viruses and malware-free data from one drive to another or USB to Mac. It provides protection against phishing activities, theft, and PC hack. CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Activation Key is helpful to optimize the performance of Mac.

CleanMyMac is a powerful app to clean, optimize, and protect your Mac for years of use. Run instant system cleanups, uninstall and update apps, remove malware, detect and erase files of any size, boost speed, and view a detailed visualization of your storage in Space Lens. All to fine-tune your Mac.

It makes your mac faster, efficient, and light to perform any task. They clean junk files, duplicate files, unwanted applications, malicious extensions, and harmful internet tools. He scans download data, shared data, USB, Windows drives sharing data, and email attachments. CleanMyMac4.8.4 is including other Mac operating systems and device optimization tools.

CleanMyMac XCrackis a powerful application for cleaning, optimizing, and protecting your Mac for years of use. It has a variety of tools, including complete system cleanup, uninstaller to delete applications on Mac, malware removal, a shredder to eliminate trace files, and a set of optimization tweaks to speed up. MacPaw Clean My Mac X Activation Code 2021 is like a helper for your Mac, keeping it clean to work like new.

CleanMyMac X Crack With License Key Full Version Free

Temporary files may accumulate on your drive until you run out of space, and your Mac’s configuration may become less optimized over time, slowing it down. CleanMyMac offers a complete toolkit to solve this problem.

The latest version of CleanMyMac X License Key 2021 is an all-in-one package for optimizing your Mac. It is capable of cleaning megatons of junk and making your computer run faster. Due to its multi-functionality, you can call it macOS cleaner, performance monitor, malware remover, and ransom. This program identifies dozens of unnecessary file types and scans them in nanoseconds. Your system vso downloader 4 - Crack Key For U a lot of useless files that need to be cleaned. So this app is the best recommendation for this. It can clean old system folders, photos, iTunes, mail, browsers, and large files.

CleanMyMac X 2021 Keygen includes the full version of Torrent

This application has the potential to take all the additional load on your system. In this way, you speed up your computer and prevent your computer from slowing down. The latest CleanMyMac X Keygen 4.8.2 gives you lifetime access to its cool features. Speeds up your Mac and makes it more responsive. Also, the full Cleanmymac cracking provides multi-language support to users all over the world. This program can silently detect all programs that are running in the background. Also, Cracked Cleanmymac allows you to turn it on or off as you wish. Besides that, it increases the speed of the processor.

CleanMyMac 2021 Full Torrent Free Download takes care of your privacy. For example, it keeps all your internet activities private, including browsing, etc. This program automatically clears all your browsing history like a browser kill switch. Besides that, it keeps you away from all the unwanted programs and threats.

CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Key Features:

  • Deeply scan your Mac.
  • Scans everything on your Mac.
  • Clean, optimize, and maintain your Mac.
  • Monitors the health of your Mac.
  • Removes gigabytes of junk from any drive.
  • Safely cleaned from your Mac.
  • Scan Mac’s system, Mail, Photos, iTunes, Trash bins, and old folder.
  • Cleans hidden data.
  • Speed ​​up Mac
    If your Mac has recently slowed down, you can regain speed with the optimization and maintenance tools in CleanMyMac Cracked. Both the system and the hard drive are messy with all kinds of junk, which is natural for the Mac. That’s why you need all the scripting and tweaking to get back to the speed your Mac had before.
  • Disc Cleaning
    There is almost no pleasure in browsing all your folders looking for files you don’t need. With CleanMyMac License Key, it’s ten times easier because it does the boring part for you: cleanmymac x activation code github and sorting old files and digging caches with random application trash. All you have to do is press Clear at the end.
  • Uninstall app
    Mac applications are complicated when it comes to uninstalling. Moving it to Trash doesn’t free your Mac from all application files and some folders with the leftovers left on the drive. CleanMyMac Licensed Uninstaller removes unnecessary applications completely and with one click.
  • Malware Protection
    If you still believe a Mac isn’t infected with a virus, it’s time to update your information. The only way to keep malicious programs in place is to provide your regular Mac malware scan. CleanMyMac Activated can identify thousands of threats and neutralize them in seconds.
  • Clear history and cookies
    It’s much easier to choose all browsers you use in CleanMyMac Activation Key and delete all history, cookies, and cache in one click. You do not have to open each browser separately and look for where the developer has hidden cache history and clearing.
  • Delete old mail attachments
    Your desktop Mail Client stores all email attachments on your drive, even those you never downloaded from your own mail. It’s easier for your Mac to view and access these files. But in reality, these files take up gigabytes and you really don’t need them. So why not delete it and free up space?
  • The point
    CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Serial Key has received some nice improvements and is a fast and reliable way to remove gigabytes of junk from your hard drive. The Uninstaller and Updater modules have been amazing in their functions and utilities, but the Malware module is still unknown and development for five months has not taken it to the level where I am comfortable recommending it to other Mac users for their intended purpose destiny.

CleanMyMac X 4.3.0 Full Cracked TNT - lasopacpa

CleanMyMac X Features:

Mac system acceleration

In the event that your Mac has recently slowed down, you can restore speed with CleanMyMac X’s maintenance and optimization tools. Both the system and the hard drive are cluttered with all sorts of junk, which is normal for Macs. This is why you need all the scripts and modifications to get back to the speed your Mac used to be.

Disk cleanup

It’s hardly fun browsing through all your folders looking for files you don’t need. With CleanMyMac X it is ten times easier because the application does the boring part for you: it searches and classifies old files and searches a cache with a random junk application. All you have to do is press “Run” at the end.

Update and uninstall apps

Mac applications are difficult to uninstall. Moving it to the Trash doesn’t actually Wondershare Dr.Fone Full Toolkit Registration key your Mac of all associated leftovers and files. The CleanMyMac X uninstaller completely removes unnecessary applications, while the updater allows you to constantly update necessary applications.

Remove malware and privacy

Although it is less vulnerable than other systems, macOS is still vulnerable to viruses. The only way to prevent malware is to run a regular malware scan on your Mac. CleanMyMac X Protection will help you neutralize virus threats, as well as clear browsing data on demand.

Get rid of large and unwanted files

Use CleanMyMac’s ruthless shredder to free up disk space and erase junk files forever. The tool removes all hidden items, also those that are blocked due to system errors. If you’re not sure what storage you have, check your Mac for large, old files – they may be hiding there.

See your storage with Space Lens

With CleanMyMac X, even the most clogged volume can be seen in detail. Space Lens visualizes the storage as a map made up of small and large files, including hidden files. Analyze internal and external storage, compare file and folder sizes, and delete separate items.

How to Activate CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 with Crack?

  1. 1st of all install CleanMyMac 4.8.4 free from the official site, download folder, or DVD.
  2. Go to properties of CleanMyMac 4.8.4
  3. Check activation status and Change CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Activation Code if not activated.
  4. Now copy the Activation Number of CleanMyMac 4.8.4 or use crack from the download folder.
  5. Paste in the activation box.
  6. Wait for some time to show a successful activation message.
  7. Finally, enjoy using registered CleanMyMac 4.8.4

How to clean your Mac in 3 simple steps:

  1. Install & open CleanMyMac 4.8.1 interface.
  2. Now Press the Scan button to see how much junk can be removed.
  3. Next Press Clean to get rid of that junk in seconds.

CleanMyMac X Serial Keys:

QASWED4-R5T6Y7U8-I90OP-0O9I8U7

Y6T5R4-E3W23E4-R5T6Y78-UI90O9I8

U7Y6T5R4-E3SWE4-R5T6Y7-U8I90OO

9I8U7Y6T5-R4DE4R-T56Y7U-I9O0I8U

HY76GT5-FRDESW-EDRT6YH-7UJIKOI

CleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crack + Activation Number Keygen 2021 Free FromOfficial Links or Shared Below.

Download Now

Note: I humbly request you to purchase Genuine / Working CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Activation Number from CleanMyMac 4.8.4 Official site or Authenticated dealer.

Источник: https://crackedinfo.org/cleanmymac-x-crack/

CleanMyMac X 4.7.0 Crack Activation Number With Torrent Free Download (2021)

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack Activation Number With Keygen (2021)

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack is an amazing app for cleaning and optimizing any Mac. Through it, you can maintain, clean, optimize and secure your Mac system. The program enables you to remove all types of unnecessary junk files such as temp, trash, iTunes junk, mail attachments, corrupt file and more. Also, this cleaner makes memory space for other use. You can easily remove and delete any data with this software on Mac. What’s more, it keeps away the virus, malware, spyware, adware, and others from your system. CleanMyMac X Activation Numberimproves your system speed and provides faster boot time for better response to the software.

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack With Latest Keygen 2021 Free Download

Furthermore, It can scan every inch of your system with the built-in latest scanner. Its scanner is equipped with the latest searching technique for identifying the entire hidden file as well. Also, this app keeps your system safe and does not delete any of the files that are essential for running your system. Overall, disk clean pro-CleanMyMac XKeygen is the only best and most useful Mac optimization program with a health guard, speed booster, junk cleaner as well as protection from online threats.

CleanMyMac X 4.9.2 Crack Mac + Torrent Full Version 2021 Free Download

Also, it keeps your substance painter 2019.2 crack - Free Activators safe and does not delete any of the files that are essential for running your system. In addition, it offers an alert feature to inform users of different messages. It offers a very easy to use and understand but elegant graphical user interface. You can use CleanMyMac Torrentwithout any knowledge or training. It offers complete functions with just a few clicks. Such as you can scan your complete system by pressing just one button Scan. And then clean all the files by pressing the clean button. Furthermore, it is very powerful, lightweight and resource-efficient. It does not slow down the processor while running. It has many safety algorithms for the safe cleaning of your Mac.

CleanmyMac Key Features

  • It is an all in one program for cleaning all kinds of junk data.
  • You can scan your system in full with one button click.
  • It allows you to remove the photo, temp files, iPhone files, broken files as well as trash bins data.
  • It has a large collection of all the rules and exceptions for only selecting noncritical files for deletion.
  • With the selection feature, a user can customize cleaning by only selecting a specific file format or files for cleaning.
  • It allows a user to optimize disk storage by freeing space for new data.
  • Removes any processes stuck in RAM and increases system performance.
  • It also provides email cleaning. Due to attachment mail becoming heavy and taking a lot of space with just one click you can remove all data from emails.
  • It enables users to completely control all the saved data on disk. With this, no data is hidden from the user view.

CleanmyMac Features

  • You can save a lot of memory by clearing the photo gallery without removing any image files. The image library not only contains images but large caches as well. Which occupies many gigabytes of memory this program removes or cleans these caches.
  • Same way iTune account or collection also has much more data than the saved tunes. With this, you can clear all useless and redundant data and free up space for new data.
  • Like house Mac also contain many trash bin. Each trash bin for a different type of file. With this tool, you can manage all these bins without any difficulty. You can clean all these app trash bins, image trash bin, mail trash bin, and many others.
  • You can use it as the application manager for completely removing any application from your system. Many times when you uninstall or delete an application from the system. Its associated or related data remain in your system which not only takes memory space but can also cause problems with your system. It allows you to remove all the data related to any application in a very easy way.
  • A lot of your data in the system is very private or confidential for users. Users do not want anyone to recover this data after deletion. This program offers features for removing data in such a way that there is no possibility of recovery.
  • Not only clean, but this tool also offers a complete statistic report of how your Mac system is working. You can get complete performance, efficiency and health report of your system.

System Requirements

  • Mac OS X 11 or later
  • 64-bit, Intel processor

CleanMyMac Activation Number

  • QASWED4-R5T6Y7U8-I90OP-0O9I8U7
  • Y6T5R4-E3W23E4-R5T6Y78-UI90O9I8
  • U7Y6T5R4-E3SWE4-R5T6Y7-U8I90OO
  • 9I8U7Y6T5-R4DE4R-T56Y7U-I9O0I8U
  • HY76GT5-FRDESW-EDRT6YH-7UJIKOI

How to Crack CleanMyMac X?

  • First of all Download a Cracked Exe Here
  • Unzip it and forced to run
  • Now Click on Install a File
  • Wait for Installation
  • Then Click on Generate Serial Keys
  • Copy it and paste
  • Processes Done.

Related

CleaningMacOptimizerSoftware

apple m1 compatiblebest mac cleanerbest mac cleaning softwareclean my mac crackClean my Mac DownloadClean my Mac freeclean my mac serialClean my Mac X CrackCleaningCleanMyMaccleanmymac 2CleanMyMac 2019CleanMyMac 2020CleanMyMac 3cleanmymac 3 activation codecleanmymac 3 activation numbercleanmymac 3 crackcleanmymac 3 kickasscleanmymac 3 licenseCleanMyMac 4cleanmymac 4 activation codeCleanMyMac 4 crackCleanMyMac 4 freeCleanMyMac 4.6 12CleanMyMac 4.7 3 CrackCleanMyMac 4.8.2 free downloadcleanmymac activationCleanMyMac activation codecleanmymac activation keyCleanMyMac Activation Numbercleanmymac activation number freecleanmymac activation number txtcleanmymac alternativeCleanMyMac Classiccleanmymac couponCleanMyMac crackcleanmymac crack 2019cleanmymac crack codeCleanMyMac crack downloadCleanMyMac crack free downloadCleanMyMac crack keygencleanmymac crack youtubecleanmymac cracked 2021 downloadcleanmymac cracked downloadCleanMyMac downloadCleanMyMac download freecleanmymac freeCleanMyMac free downloadCleanMyMac free download 2021cleanmymac free licenseCleanMyMac full crackCleanMyMac keygencleanmymac licenseCleanMyMac License 2021CleanMyMac License 4.8.2cleanmymac license keycleanmymac reviewCleanMyMac review 2020CleanMyMac review 2021CleanMyMac torrentCleanMyMac Update 4.7.4CleanMyMac with crackCleanMyMac X 2021 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.5.3 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.5.4 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.6 10 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.6 15 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.6.12 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.1 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.2 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.3 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.7.4 Crackcleanmymac x 4.8 keycleanmymac x 4.8 tntCleanMyMac X 4.8.0CleanMyMac X 4.8.0 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.0 freeCleanMyMac X 4.8.1 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.2 Activation NumberCleanMyMac X 4.8.2 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.2 Crack Activation Numbercleanmymac x 4.8.3CleanMyMac X 4.8.3 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.4 Crackcleanmymac x 4.8.5CleanMyMac X 4.8.5 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.6 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.7 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.8CleanMyMac X 4.8.8 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.9 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.8.9 Mac TorrentsCleanMyMac X 4.9.0 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.9.1 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.9.1 Mac TorrentsCleanMyMac X 4.9.2 CrackCleanMyMac X 4.9.2 DownloadCleanMyMac X 4.9.2 With License KeyCleanMyMac X 5 Crackcleanmymac x activationCleanMyMac X Activation CodeCleanMyMac X Activation Code 2021CleanMyMac X Activation Code 4.8.1CleanMyMac X Activation Code downloadcleanmymac x activation code freecleanmymac x activation code generatorCleanMyMac X Activation Code GitHubCleanMyMac X activation code redditcleanmymac x activation keycleanmymac x activation key freeCleanMyMac X Activation Numbercleanmymac x activation number 2019cleanmymac x activation number 201cleanmymac x activation number 2019cleanmymac x activation number 2020cleanmymac x activation number generatorCleanMyMac X Activation number Generator onlinecleanmymac x activation number keygencleanmymac x activation number txtCleanMyMac x crackcleanmymac x crack 2020cleanmymac x crack itacleanmymac x crack passwordCleanMyMac X Crack RedditCleanMyMac X Crack TNTCleanMyMac X Crack versioncleanmymac x crackedcleanmymac x for macCleanMyMac X freeCleanMyMac X free 4.7.4CleanMyMac X free DownloadCleanMyMac X free KeygenCleanMyMac X free torrentcleanmymac x keycleanmymac x key 2021cleanmymac x keygencleanmymac x licensecleanmymac x license freecleanmymac x license keycleanmymac x license key freeCleanMyMac X Mac 4.6.3 Serial KeyCleanMyMac X Redditcleanmymac x serialcleanmymac x serial numbercleanmymac x torrentCrack Version of cleanmyMacdisk clean prodownload CleanMyMac 3.7.4Download CleanMyMac XDownload CleanMyMac X 4.9.0Download CleanMyMac X 4.9.2download cleanmymac x for freefree cleanmymacfree mac cleanerHow to get CleanMyMac X for freeHow to get CleanMyMac X for free 4.8.1is cleanmymac safemacpaw cleanmymac xsetapp downloadWhat is the latest version of CleanMyMac X

Источник: https://scracked.com/cleanmymac-crack-activation-number-free-download/

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting daemon tools pro download - Crack Key For U 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of bitdefender mobile security premium apk - Activators Patch a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Cleanmymac x activation code github users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most cleanmymac x activation code github, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, cleanmymac x activation code github visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community . a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,000 articles, 42,570,406 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia . are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users . 524 people . And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while cleanmymac x activation code github editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have AnyToISO 3.9.3 key - Free Activators 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,000

Cebuano 6,061,269

Swedish 2,875,133

German 2,633,307

French 2,374,875

Dutch 2,071,599

Russian 1,771,271

Spanish 1,731,740

Italian 1,726,497

Polish 1,496,868

Egyptian Arabic 1,376,598

Japanese 1,300,979

Vietnamese 1,270,091

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,531

Arabic 1,143,365

Ukrainian 1,123,197

Portuguese 1,077,389

Persian 846,650

Catalan 689,772

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested cleanmymac x activation code github while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization . his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice . and . his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians . remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the cleanmymac x activation code github of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency . We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority . (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends sound forge audio studio 13 review - Crack Key For U MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by cleanmymac x activation code github Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish caching servers and back-end layer caching is done by Apache Traffic Server.[265]

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

3 Replies to “Cleanmymac x activation code github”

  1. Sir mera account sbi ke "Grahak Seva Kendra" me hai. Account ke saath mera number register tha but aircel ke band hone se mera wo number band ho gya hai. maine whan ke ko ko number bdlne ko kha to unhone kha ki " grahak seva Kendra" me ek baar jo number register ho jaata hai wo baad me change nhi hota hai. Sir, please koi tarika btaeeye jisse ki mai number change krva kr dusra number register krva skun.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *